SOC 2 and regulated-industry software, without grinding your roadmap to a halt

SOC 2 · security · regulated industries

When this is your problem

  • An enterprise prospect sent a security questionnaire, and there's no one to answer it.
  • A customer contract requires SOC 2 Type II (or Type I as a first step).
  • You sell into insurance, healthcare, government or finance, where every record may become evidence.
  • You're heading into diligence, and security and compliance were "deferred."

Type I vs Type II, in plain English

  • SOC 2 Type I: an auditor checks that your controls are designed properly, at a point in time.
  • SOC 2 Type II: an auditor checks that your controls actually operated effectively over an observation period, usually three to twelve months.

Enterprise buyers usually want Type II. A common path is Type I first, then Type II after the observation window. The audit itself is done by an independent CPA firm. My job is getting you ready and keeping you there.

→ Getting to SOC 2 Type II without grinding your team to a halt

How I run it without stopping the roadmap

  1. Scope it right. The smallest honest boundary of systems and data the audit needs to cover.
  2. Automate the evidence. A continuous-compliance platform (I've used both Vanta and Drata) wired into your cloud, source control and ticketing collects evidence in the background. No screenshot scramble the week before the auditor arrives.
  3. Run a silent observation window. Engineering keeps shipping. The tooling only interrupts when someone actually drifts out of a control.
  4. Fix the real gaps first: access control, change control, incident response, and vendor/data-handling (including your AI vendors' data-retention terms).
  5. Answer the questionnaires once. A reusable security package your sales team can send.
  6. Keep it running after the audit, so Type II renewal isn't another fire drill.

Building software for regulated industries

In consumer SaaS you optimize for engagement. In insurance, healthcare and government you optimize for defensibility: every state change is a potential legal event, and your system has to produce a record that survives an auditor or a lawsuit. I've built in these environments for most of my career, from industrial systems on the factory floor to insurance and government platforms. → Building software for regulated industries

Proof

  • SOC 2 Type II across multiple SaaS platforms (Beyond Commissions; 6th Street / CloudQix).
  • Regulated, reliability-critical industries: insurance, healthcare, government, finance, media. → Results: the F&G Life case study
  • My own AI-built product, Pilot for Trades, was architected to SOC 2 controls, built to the controls but not audited. It's an R&D build, never released, with no customers, by design. → The receipts

Frequently asked questions

A security review or SOC 2 deadline on the calendar?

Related reading

Getting to SOC 2 Type II Without Grinding Your Team to a Halt feature image

Getting to SOC 2 Type II Without Grinding Your Team to a Halt

By Tom Lang on September 16, 2026

Getting SOC 2 Type II doesn't have to freeze your roadmap for six months. Done wrong, it's a company-wide fire drill; done right, it's mostly automating the engineering hygiene you should already be practicing. Having led it more than once, here's the plain-English difference between Type I and Type II, the no-grind playbook that keeps your team shipping, the self-inflicted traps that turn it into a death march, and the one thing that changes every single time.

Read more
Enterprise Security Demands, Startup Budget: How to Meet the Bar Without a Security Department feature image

Enterprise Security Demands, Startup Budget: How to Meet the Bar Without a Security Department

By Tom Lang on January 20, 2025

The security problem a growth-stage company actually faces isn't adversarial machine learning — it's the enterprise customer who shows up with a security questionnaire and no patience, and you with no security department. Drawing on taking a small SaaS platform through SOC 2 Type I and II, here's how I think about meeting a serious security bar without waste or theater — starting with the two things you have to understand before you write a single line of a plan.

Read more
Building Software for Regulated Industries: Insurance, Healthcare, and Government feature image

Building Software for Regulated Industries: Insurance, Healthcare, and Government

By Tom Lang on September 16, 2026

In consumer SaaS you optimize for engagement. In insurance, healthcare, and government, you optimize for defensibility — because every state change in your database is a potential legal event, and you're building a record that has to survive a federal auditor or a lawsuit. Drawing on a career shipping in regulated markets, here's how building for these verticals is architecturally different, the fatal mistake consumer-SaaS teams make trying to enter them, and why a CTO who's actually done it is the moat that wins you the deal.

Read more
Minimum Viable Governance: Data and AI Guardrails for Companies That Aren't Google feature image

Minimum Viable Governance: Data and AI Guardrails for Companies That Aren't Google

By Tom Lang on November 18, 2024

Enterprise data-governance frameworks — councils, stewardship org charts, fifty-page manuals — will crush a growth-stage company's velocity. What you need is Minimum Viable Governance: just enough structure to pass your audits, prevent leaks, and keep bad data from breaking your models. Here's the right-sized stack I'd actually put in place — for governing the data and AI you run, and for the day you ship AI to your users.

Read more
Reliability Without an SRE Team feature image

Reliability Without an SRE Team

By Tom Lang on February 3, 2025

The enterprise pitch says: buy an AIOps platform and it becomes your SRE team. That's backwards. Reliability for a small team at real scale isn't about an AI that makes sense of your mess — it's about engineering your system to survive failure automatically. Here are the four non-negotiables, and an honest split of where AI-assisted observability earns its place versus where it's premature noise.

Read more